While morality may be in gaernel pro-social, it is not in every specific case. So there are times when you must choose between being moral, and being helpful.This is an odd-sounding statement to me. I gaernelly think that being helpful is a subsection of being moral. So saying there are times when you must choose between being moral, and being helpful is like saying there are times when you must choose between between driving an automobile and driving a car or there are times when you must choose between having an offspring and having a son. I think you are using the term morality when you really mean moral codes. Moral codes are sets of rules developed to save computation time when trying to act morally. Rather than spend lots of time trying to weigh a course of action someone with a moral code simply follows a set of rules that have been demonstrated to, on average, produce positive results. Doing this is usually good, prosocial, helpful, moral, and so on because it means that you aren’t locked in indecision when moral choices come your way because you don’t have time to weigh your options. It’s also a good guard against corruption, a clear unambiguous code makes it harder to convince yourself you’re behaving morally when you’re not.The trolly problem is one particular rare instance where following a normal moral code has obvious bad consequences that can be seen very easily with very little necessary computation. People naturally feel uncomfortable, since their moral code normally produces good results, it feels wrong to break it.The person who acts to stop the trolly is being moral. They’re just basing their moral judgement on a cost-benefit analysis instead of a set of rules. Normally this is a bad idea, it usually takes too long and is too open to corruption. But in this rare freak event it produces better consequences than following the rules. And producing good consequences is what being moral is all about.
Does no one else find it weird that it's a panda who is supposed to be… an Italian gangster? …and, cheese? I mean, I've seen some strange ads before, but… wtf?
Fuck you Panda… you're not even a real BEAR. You're an oversized Raccoon that doesn't even like to breed. I don't want to eat your stupid chee… oh god! It's in my house….
you’re interested to help, pesale visit the Sponsors page or send them your inquiries via the Contact page.I’m glad to see more blogging events like these that are being organized and started in the
Scroll To Top
First post
so technically you HAD to eat/buy the cheese or you would get killed by a giant panda
lol thank god there's no panda cheese for sale here
How does Pandas and cheese go together? Do they make it out of panda milk?
Panda cheese…sounds illegal.
The look on there faces is priceless
Their*
*you're* a homo
go back to filming malcom
I laughed my ass off so hard.
I LOVE PANDA
That's one angry ass bear.
The suspense!
While morality may be in gaernel pro-social, it is not in every specific case. So there are times when you must choose between being moral, and being helpful.This is an odd-sounding statement to me. I gaernelly think that being helpful is a subsection of being moral. So saying there are times when you must choose between being moral, and being helpful is like saying there are times when you must choose between between driving an automobile and driving a car or there are times when you must choose between having an offspring and having a son. I think you are using the term morality when you really mean moral codes. Moral codes are sets of rules developed to save computation time when trying to act morally. Rather than spend lots of time trying to weigh a course of action someone with a moral code simply follows a set of rules that have been demonstrated to, on average, produce positive results. Doing this is usually good, prosocial, helpful, moral, and so on because it means that you aren’t locked in indecision when moral choices come your way because you don’t have time to weigh your options. It’s also a good guard against corruption, a clear unambiguous code makes it harder to convince yourself you’re behaving morally when you’re not.The trolly problem is one particular rare instance where following a normal moral code has obvious bad consequences that can be seen very easily with very little necessary computation. People naturally feel uncomfortable, since their moral code normally produces good results, it feels wrong to break it.The person who acts to stop the trolly is being moral. They’re just basing their moral judgement on a cost-benefit analysis instead of a set of rules. Normally this is a bad idea, it usually takes too long and is too open to corruption. But in this rare freak event it produces better consequences than following the rules. And producing good consequences is what being moral is all about.
Dam, that's a mean ass bear
10th POST
I do the same type of things dressed as a giant penis at a porn store. I've been dubbed "One evil prick"
Why would you need a costume?
The more I watch it, the more I laugh.
panda, alaheshla
I'm totally getting a panda suit and doing this in random stores.
Does no one else find it weird that it's a panda who is supposed to be… an Italian gangster? …and, cheese? I mean, I've seen some strange ads before, but… wtf?
Funny…I want to be the Panda.
hahaha I LOVE IT WOKE UP MY GF BECAUSE I LAUGHED SO MUCH
this is an Egyptian advertising campaign for a cheese
I was totally freaked out when they started talking Egyptian, I didn't expect it
Fuck you Panda… you're not even a real BEAR. You're an oversized Raccoon that doesn't even like to breed. I don't want to eat your stupid chee… oh god! It's in my house….
they rippin off the bruins bear commercials? seems so
Am I the only one who draws parallels between this and the "Mm Whatcha Say" meme?
i laughed my ass of at this
you’re interested to help, pesale visit the Sponsors page or send them your inquiries via the Contact page.I’m glad to see more blogging events like these that are being organized and started in the