Celebrity close-ups sans Photoshop (26 photos)

0 0
0 0
  • http://therainforestsite.com Bunny wabba

    It doesn't matter all that much if there is no photoshop involved in these pics since the women are in makeup and they are all in perfect lighting. Hence the dilated pupils and no shadows on their faces. Shadows emphasize lines and wrinkles.

  • Legless

    who the f**k is #8

    • RiKo


  • G55

    I don't know who most of these people are… Galadriel is still pretty, though. #22

  • MeanJoe

    Yeah Zizou! Zidane's a legend. Materazzi's a twat.

  • gdad

    Weird angle to begin with. Wonder if it was still digital. Looks kind of like film.

  • Heber Coll

    Who is the photographer? They look like they were taken with a normal or wide angle lens up close, some of them look pretty distorted.

  • Chivish

    There was one in the mix who was not a celebrity, I think he might have been the racist co-owner of The Chive. . .

  • Bill

    These are photos by Martin Schoeller and are heavily "photoshopped." The person who posted this not only didn't have the decency to link to or even name the photographer, they don't know anything about photo manipulation. I think I'll let Martin know so he can sue you for copyright violation!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Forrest-Herron/1287270554 Forrest Herron

    #3, #6, #11, #12, #24


    • Doogle

      4 legends and one who maybe had the potential.

  • 3essea

    Cape Town, South Africa

  • mka

    no photoshop my ass! It´s obvious the photos are modified! I don´t really understand what they want to prove? That humans get older and not everyone is honoured with a fairytale beauty? I think we all know that. And those who don´t…well, they are the naive ones, eventually frustrated because they don´t look like photoshop models. U can´t fight against time, against nature, no matter how much money you have! And thanx God for that! thanx God money can´t buy it all!

  • >18Only

    Maybe I am out of the loop but I didn't recognize about 10 of the people up there.

  • Cza

    #9 Wasn't sure if I was looking at a new "douchebaggery" post.

  • Dan-0

    #26 Everybody Wang Chung tonight!

  • http://needwanthave.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/happy-friday/ Happy Friday | Need. Want. Have.

    […] More to see here […]

  • Russ

    Sarah Palin is pure ugly with or without Photoshop.

  • Gerry

    These photos are all heavily altered. more than the average shot you see in a magazine. Contrast has been boosted a lot and there is a lot of sharpening–so you see some skin imperfections (probably more than you would in person). But the idea that this is not altered is silly and glaringly obvious to even the most casual observer with any interest in photography. this is with photoshop and without integrity

  • ProvenZer0

    #7 RIP, "Baby wants to fuck! Baby wants to fuck Blue Velvet!"

  • carli

    Thanks-no coment-arius=sincerely!Made in Venice!

  • susiebythesea

    there is no way these aren't photo-shopped. Look at the light reflection in each eye it's the same on everyone.

  • klr

    I actually think #20 looks better than usual here. Definitely sort of bizarre, but more handsome, like she could mature into it. As opposed to her normal "skank-ass ho" look.

  • person

    the eyes have been digitally altered. not untouched images.

  • cid

    Jesus, this species is so fucked up! Everyone is ugly. Including you.

  • you

    I'll never understand what Beyonce sees in this guy..

    #9 Still hot, though.

  • lillieb

    these all look fake. what's paris an alien? without make and a little distortion.. pleae.

1 3 4 5 6
blog comments powered by Disqus